Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • BLOOD-PRESSURE  (3)
  • 1
    Keywords: FOLLOW-UP ; COHORT ; MORTALITY ; BLOOD-PRESSURE ; DIABETES-MELLITUS ; METAANALYSIS ; BODY-MASS INDEX ; CUTANEOUS MALIGNANT-MELANOMA ; BASAL-CELL CARCINOMA ; REGRESSION DILUTION
    Abstract: Background Little is known about the associations of metabolic aberrations with malignant melanoma (MM) and nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC). Objectives To assess the associations between metabolic factors (both individually and combined) and the risk of skin cancer in the large prospective Metabolic Syndrome and Cancer Project (Me-Can). Methods During a mean follow-up of 12 years of the Me-Can cohort, 1728 (41% women) incident MM, 230 (23% women) fatal MM and 1145 (33% women) NMSC were identified. Most NMSC cases (76%) were squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (873, 33% women). Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression for quintiles and standardized z-scores (with a mean of 0 and SD of 1) of body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides and for a combined metabolic syndrome score. Risk estimates were corrected for random error in the measurements. Results Blood pressure per unit increase of z-score was associated with an increased risk of incident MM cases in men and women [HR 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.31 and HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.36, respectively] and fatal MM cases among women (HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.58-3.64). In men, all quintiles for BMI above the reference were associated with a higher risk of incident MM. In women, SCC NMSC risk increased across quintiles for glucose levels (P-trend 0.02) and there was a trend with triglyceride concentration (P-trend 0.09). Conclusion These findings suggest that mechanisms linked to blood pressure may be involved in the pathogenesis of MM. SCC NMSC in women could be related to glucose and lipid metabolism.
    Type of Publication: Journal article published
    PubMed ID: 22530854
    Signatur Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Keywords: CANCER ; BLOOD ; SUPPORT ; COHORT ; DISEASE ; MORTALITY ; RISK ; SAMPLE ; SAMPLES ; METABOLISM ; INDEX ; HEALTH ; colorectal cancer ; OBESITY ; COLORECTAL-CANCER ; GLUCOSE ; BLOOD-PRESSURE ; nutrition ; leptin ; BODIES ; INCREASE ; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE ; LEVEL ; EPIDEMIOLOGIC EVIDENCE ; methods ; VARIABLES ; CANCER-RISK ; colorectal neoplasms ; ENGLAND ; C-PEPTIDE ; MALE SMOKERS ; Adiponectin ; insulin resistance ; body mass ; blood glucose ; NORTHERN SWEDEN ; INSULIN-RESISTANCE SYNDROME
    Abstract: Objective: To examine the relation of well-known factors of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) as well as related circulating factors, with risk of colorectal cancer. Methods: We performed a case control study of 306 colorectal cancer cases and 595 matched controls nested in the Northern Sweden Health and Disease Cohort. Levels of C-peptide, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), leptin and adiponectin were measured in cryopreserved samples. Body mass index (BMI), systolic and diastolic blood pressure and fasting and post-load plasma glucose, had been measured in a subcohort. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) of disease, including risk assessments for the MetS factors: obesity (BMI430 kg m(-2)), hypertension (blood pressure 〉= 140/90 mmHg or use of anti-hypertensive drugs) and hyperglycaemia (fasting glucose 〉= 6.1 mmol 1(-1) or post-load glucose in capillary plasma 〉= 8.9 mmol 1(-1)). Results: None of the studied variables were significantly associated with risk across quartiles. Presence of obesity, hypertension and hyperglycaemia significantly increased the risk of colorectal cancer; OR for three vs null factors was 2.57 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.20-5.52; P-trend = 0.0021), as compared to a 30 to 70% increased risk for the factors in single. Similarly, top decile levels of C-peptide, HbA1c and leptin/adiponectin ratio were associated with an increased risk; ORs for top vs deciles 1-9 were 1.56 (95% CI 0.93-2.62; P = 0.090), 1.83 (95% CI 1.00-3.36; P = 0.051) and 1.50 (95% CI 0.83-2.71; P = 0.18), respectively. Conclusions: Our study support the view that components of the MetS increase risk of colorectal cancer, and further suggests that only very high levels of metabolic factors confer an increased risk
    Type of Publication: Journal article published
    PubMed ID: 17878894
    Signatur Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Keywords: CANCER ; COHORT ; cohort studies ; EPIDEMIOLOGY ; RISK ; ASSOCIATION ; WOMEN ; OBESITY ; cholesterol ; BLOOD-PRESSURE ; ADULTS ; METAANALYSIS ; blood pressure ; BODY-MASS INDEX ; OVERWEIGHT ; colorectal neoplasms ; INDIVIDUAL DATA ; blood glucose ; INSULIN-RESISTANCE SYNDROME ; metabolic syndrome X ; REGRESSION DILUTION ; triglycerides ; VASCULAR MORTALITY
    Abstract: BACKGROUND: The metabolic syndrome (MetS) has been related to an increased risk of colorectal cancer, but the modest size of previous studies precluded detailed characterization of the role of individual MetS factors and their interaction on risk. METHODS: In the Metabolic Syndrome and Cancer Project (Me-Can), data on body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, and blood levels of glucose, cholesterol, and triglycerides were available for 578,700 men and women. The mean age of participants at baseline was 44 years, and the mean follow-up was 12 years. Relative risks (RR) of colorectal cancer per 1 standard deviation increment in Z score of factors and for a combined MetS score, were calculated from Cox regression models, including adjustment for potential confounders. RESULTS: During follow-up, 2834 men and 1861 women were diagnosed with colorectal cancer. The RR of colorectal cancer for the MetS score was 1.25 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-1.32) in men, and 1.14 (95% CI, 1.06-1.22) in women. Significant associations also were observed in men for BMI (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13), blood pressure (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.18), and triglycerides (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06-1.28) and, in women, for BMI (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.15). There was no significant positive interaction between the metabolic factors on risk. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of metabolic factors and some separate factors was related to an increased risk of colorectal cancer, but there was no interaction between metabolic factors.
    Type of Publication: Journal article published
    PubMed ID: 21171019
    Signatur Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...