Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Keywords: EXPRESSION ; SURVIVAL ; THERAPY ; SITES ; TRIAL ; PROGRESSION ; AMPLIFICATION ; MARKERS ; PREDICTION
    Abstract: BACKGROUND: In metastatic breast cancer (MBC), antigen profiles of metastatic tissue and primary tumor differ in up to 20 % of patients. Reassessment of predictive markers, including human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression, might help to optimize MBC treatment. While tissue sampling is invasive and often difficult to repeat, circulating tumor cell (CTC) analysis requires only a blood sample and might provide an easy-to-repeat, real-time "liquid biopsy" approach. The present retrospective study was conducted to compare HER2 expression in primary tumors, metastatic tissue, and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from MBC patients and to analyze the potential impact of HER2 overexpression by CTCs on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in MBC. METHODS: CTC-positive (five or more CTCs/7.5 mL blood; CellSearch(R), Janssen Diagnostics) MBC patients starting a new line of systemic treatment were eligible for the study. HER2 status of CTCs was determined by immunofluorescence (CellSearch(R)). HER2 status of primary (PRIM) and metastatic (MET) tumor tissue was determined by immunohistochemistry. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier plots. RESULTS: One hundred seven patients (median age (range) 57 (33-81) years) were included. 100/107 (93 %) patients were followed-up for a median [95 % confidence interval (CI)] of 28.5 [25.1-40.1] months. Of 37/107 (35 %) CTC-HER2-positive patients only 10 (27 %) were PRIM-HER2-positive. 6/46 (13 %) patients were MET-HER2-positive; only 2/10 (20 %) CTC-HER2-positive patients were MET-HER2-positive. Overall accuracy between CTC-HER2 expression and PRIM-HER2 and MET-HER2 status was 69 % and 74 %, respectively. Kaplan-Meier plots of PFS and OS by CTC-HER2 status revealed significantly longer median [95 % CI] PFS of CTC-HER2-positive versus CTC-HER2-negative patients (7.4 [4.7-13.7] versus 4.34 [3.5-5.9] months; p = 0.035). CTC-HER2-positive status showed no significant difference for OS (13.7 [7.7-30.0] versus 8.7 [5.9-15.3] months; p = 0.287). CONCLUSIONS: HER2 status can change during the course of breast cancer. CTC phenotyping may serve as an easy-to-perform "liquid biopsy" to reevaluate HER2 status and potentially guide treatment decisions. Further, prospective studies are needed.
    Type of Publication: Journal article published
    PubMed ID: 25972110
    Signatur Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Keywords: SURVIVAL ; BLOOD ; THERAPY ; SYSTEM ; PROGRESSION ; AMPLIFICATION ; chemotherapy ; MARKERS ; HER2 status ; PREDICTIVE-VALUE
    Abstract: The detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the peripheral blood of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients is an independent marker of prognosis. This large prospective multicenter study aimed to assess the impact of CTCs on overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in patients with predefined molecular subgroups of MBC. To this end, 468 MBC patients were divided into three subgroups based on immunohistochemical staining of the primary tumor: (1) hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HorR+/HER2-), (2) HER2-positive (HER2+), and (3) HorR-negative/HER2-negative (HorR-/HER2-) patients. CTC status (〈5 CTCs/7.5 ml blood (CTC-negative) vs. 〉/=5 CTCs/7.5 ml blood (CTC-positive)) was determined using the CellCearch((R)) system before patients started a new line of therapy. At baseline, 205 (42 %) patients were CTC-positive. On multivariate analysis, CTC-positivity was an independent prognostic factor for shorter PFS and OS. In HorR+/HER2- patients, median PFS [95 % CI] of CTC-negative versus CTC-positive patients was 8.60 [5.93-11.27] versus 4.33 [3.29-5.38] months (p 〈 0.001), in HER2+ patients 7.60 [5.40-9.79] versus 6.60 [4.20-9.00] months (p = 0.477) and in HorR-/HER2- patients 5.83 [5.09-6.78] versus 3.05 [1.81-4.29] months (p 〈 0.001), respectively. Median OS [95 % CI] of CTC-negative versus CTC-positive patients was as follows: not reached by either in the HorR+/HER2- subgroup (p 〈 0.001), not reached versus 18.07 [11.10-25.05] months (p = 0.001) in the HER2+ subgroup, and not reached versus 8.57 [4.07-13.07] months in the HorR-/HER2- subgroup (p = 0.001). In conclusion, our results strongly confirm the independent prognostic value of CTC enumeration in MBC patients. In contrast to recent reports, there was no association between primary tumor-based molecular subgroups and the impact of CTC status on OS. Hence, CTC status may help to identify patients who require aggressive therapy, especially among those with triple-negative MBC.
    Type of Publication: Journal article published
    PubMed ID: 23271327
    Signatur Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...